| |
DOJ: No Basis for MN Civil Rights Probe01/14 06:05
The Justice Department does not believe there is currently any basis to open
a criminal civil rights investigation into the killing of a woman by a U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis, a top department
official said Tuesday.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department does not believe there is
currently any basis to open a criminal civil rights investigation into the
killing of a woman by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in
Minneapolis, a top department official said Tuesday.
The decision to keep the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division out of
the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Good marks a sharp departure
from past administrations, which have moved quickly to probe shootings of
civilians by law enforcement officials for potential civil rights offenses.
While an FBI probe is ongoing, lawyers in the Civil Rights Division were
informed last week that they would not play a role in the investigation at this
time, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the
condition of anonymity to discuss internal department deliberations.
And on Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement
that "there is currently no basis for a criminal civil rights investigation."
The statement, first reported by CNN, did not elaborate on how the department
had reached a conclusion that no investigation was warranted.
Federal officials have said that the officer acted in self-defense and that
the driver of the Honda was engaging in "an act of domestic terrorism" when she
pulled forward toward him.
The quick pronouncement by administration officials before any meaningful
investigation could be completed has raised concerns about the federal
government's determination to conduct a thorough review of the chain of events
precipitating the shooting. Minnesota officials have also raised alarm after
federal officials blocked state investigators from accessing evidence and
declared that Minnesota has no jurisdiction to investigate the killing.
Also this week, roughly half a dozen federal prosecutors in Minnesota
resigned and several supervisors in the criminal section of the Civil Rights
Division in Washington gave notice of their departures amid turmoil over the
federal probe, according to people familiar with the matter.
Among the departures in Minnesota is First Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph
Thompson, who had been leading the sprawling investigation and prosecution of
fraud schemes in the state, two other people said. At least four other
prosecutors in the Minnesota U.S. attorney's office joined Thompson in
resigning amid a period of tension in the office, the people said. The people
spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters.
They are the latest in an exodus of career Justice Department attorneys who
have resigned or been forced out over concerns over political pressure or
shifting priorities under the Trump administration. Hundreds of Justice
Department lawyers have been fired or have left voluntarily over the last year.
Minnesota Democratic lawmakers criticized the departures, with Sen. Amy
Klobuchar, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, calling the resignations
"a loss for our state and for public safety" and warning that prosecutions
should not be driven by politics. Gov. Tim Walz said the departures raised
concerns about political pressure on career Justice Department officials.
The resignations of the lawyers in the Civil Rights Division's criminal
section, including its chief, were announced to staff on Monday, days after
lawyers were told the section would not be involved in the probe. The Justice
Department on Tuesday said those prosecutors had requested to participate in an
early retirement program "well before the events in Minnesota," and added that
"any suggestion to the contrary is false."
Founded nearly 70 years ago, the Civil Rights Division has a long history of
investigating shootings by law enforcement even though prosecutors typically
need to clear a high bar to mount a criminal prosecution.
In prior administrations, the division has moved quickly to open and
publicly announce such investigations, not only to reflect federal jurisdiction
over potential civil rights violations but also in hopes of soothing community
angst that sometimes accompanies shootings involving law enforcement.
"The level of grief, tension and anxiety on the ground in Minnesota is not
surprising," said Kristen Clarke, who led the Civil Rights Division under the
Biden administration. "And historically the federal government has played an
important role by being a neutral and impartial agency committing its resources
to conducting a full and fair investigation, and the public loses out when that
doesn't happen," she said.
In Minneapolis, for instance, the Justice Department during the first Trump
administration opened a civil rights investigation into the 2020 death of
George Floyd at the hands of city police officers that resulted in criminal
charges. The Minneapolis Police Department was separately scrutinized by the
Biden administration for potential systemic civil rights violations through
what's known as a "pattern or practice" investigation, a type of police reform
inquiry that is out of favor in the current Trump administration Justice
Department.
|
|